Home   >   Guide to Reviewers
PDF Print E-mail

Guide to Reviewers

Last Updated on Thursday, 30 August 2012 15:38

The editors think that collectively, editor, reviewers, and authors can contribute to the enhancement of the journal by ensuring that the review process is among other things, comprehensive, constructive, courteous, developmental, fair, objective, and timely.

IENGJ always take care that the papers published in the journal must meet certain criteria relating to journal content and presentation. The review form available in Resources menu is designated to help reviewers evaluate manuscripts to send to the appropriate editor. If revisions are recommended, reviewers should be as specific as possible in describing changes and should indicate which changes are recommended and which are obligatory. If a paper is rejected because it is outside the scope of the journal, reviewers might recommend that the paper be submitted elsewhere. If a paper is considered un-publishable, reviewers should reject it completely. The reviewers are asked to look at the manuscript soon after receiving it and send to an editor as soon as possible but no later than 3 weeks after receiving the paper. If they cannot meet this term, other reviewers will be sought.

The procedures guiding the selection of articles for publication in IENGJ are similar to those in place at most other engineering journals. Manuscripts are accepted for publication only after they are evaluated by at least two editors.



Content View Hits : 50544

Who's Online

We have 61 guests online